criminal

Conclusion: Disentangling Accuracy and Homology This article should not be viewed as uncritically advocating the merits of criminal profiling or as a vehicle for devaluing research into offender homology. As outlined at the outset, its objective is to attempt a broader examination of the extant literature that Kocsis and Palermo 325 may lead to some […]

who perpetrate serial sadistic sexual murders? Serial Sexually Sadistic Murder and Robbery: Comparing Apples and Oranges? Having explored the potential diversity within the supposedly same mode of crime (i.e., sexual assault), some consideration should also be afforded to generalizations that may be made across totally different modes of crime. Put simply, how valid are findings

Serial Sexually Sadistic Murder and Robbery: Comparing Apples and Oranges? Having explored the potential diversity within the supposedly same mode of crime (i.e., sexual assault), some consideration should also be afforded to generalizations that may be made across totally different modes of crime. Put simply, how valid are findings likely to be that are derived

The Diversity in Aberrant Violent Serial Offenders Two other dimensions to consider from the aforementioned hypothetical sample pool are what constitutes a serial sexual offender and thereafter whether single and serial Kocsis and Palermo 323 sexual offenders are validly comparable. Focusing on the first issue, the scholarly lit- erature chronicles substantial discourse and debate concerning

The Diversity of Offenders and Criminal Acts As a means of exploring these propositions, a sample pool in a hypothetical offender homology study will be considered. In this context, what will be examined is whether the analyzed pool of data was more likely reflective of a homogenous group of people that may have feasibly demonstrated

The Limitations of Law and the Diversity of Human Beings The classification of crime in criminal justice systems throughout the world is typi- cally conceived of as acts regarded to be breaches of the law. While the laws of a society can prescribe with comparative ease a generic constellation of behaviors that constitute a violation,

Disentangling Homology The review of the aforementioned four tenets associated with homology research calls for a number of considerations. What might explain the conflicting findings between the studies demonstrating accuracy in profilers and those unable to find evidence of offender homology? It is postulated herein that this circumstance may arise as a result of disjunction

Profilers Do Not Evaluate Situational Factors Another point of marked differentiation noted in Dern et al. (2009) are the descriptions suggested by some commentators concerning the procedures for formulating criminal profiles and those actually employed by law enforcement personnel when constructing criminal profiles.4 In this context, another tenet that seems to have emanated from homology

Criminal Profiling Relies Upon Trait-Based Connections As noted in Dern, Dern, Horn, and Horn (2009), there appear to be disparities between the conceptions imputed by some commentators on the topic of criminal profiling with the activities of actual practitioners who produce criminal profiles to assist police investigations.2 In this regard, the scientifically conservative language originally

No Links Between Offender Characteristics and Crime Behaviors A second tenet that intermittently appears to be conveyed in the literature associated with homology research is the proposition that studies have failed to demonstrate pat- terns and/or relationships between behavioral features typically exhibited in crimes and offender characteristics. As previously indicated, part of the intended purpose