What is the purpose of curriculum?

Five Key Questions

As we proceed in our exploration of early childhood curriculum, five key questions provide the organizing elements for the twelve chapters in this text. Together, they represent a coherent philosophy of education and a practical framework for reflection:

  1. What is the purpose of curriculum? (Chapters 1 and 2)
  2. What are children like and how do they learn? (Chapters 3 and 4)
  3. What is my role as a teacher? (Chapters 5 and 6)
  4. What do children need and want to know and learn about? (Chapters 7 through 11)
  5. How should curriculum be implemented? (Chapters 7 through 12)

If you begin to think about these questions now and revisit them regularly, you will establish habits of mind that will serve you well and help you make sense of triumphs and challenges you encounter.

Chapter Summary

  • Curriculum is a structured framework for teaching that is articulated with varying levels of specificity.
  • Early childhood educators have substantial responsibilities and varying degrees of flexibility about how to implement curriculum depending on the curriculum they use and the context in which they work.
  • While curriculum for young children is based on principles consistent across the span from birth to age 8, the needs, abilities, and interests of children at different times affect what curriculum includes and how it is implemented.
  • Many individuals have contributed to our understanding of how children learn and the methods and environments that best encourage the learning process. Among some of the most influential are Maria Montessori, John Dewey, Jean Piaget, and Lev Vygotsky.
  • Factors such as social values, socioeconomic conditions, politics, research, and culture contribute to individual and social world views, which in turn are reflected in different perspectives about what curriculum should include and how it should be implemented.
  • Through the work of professional organizations like NAEYC, early childhood educators advocate for developmentally appropriate practice as a framework for curriculum development. Teachers use knowledge about how children grow and learn to make decisions about curriculum and how to adapt to changing demands that affect their work.
  • Good teachers engage in regular and thoughtful reflection and inquiry about their work to integrate theory and practice.
Discussion Questions
  1. Choose one of the influential thinkers profiled in this chapter and explain why you might want to know more about his or her work and ideas.
  2. Which of the 3 T’s (transmission, transactional, transformative) perspectives comes closest to describing your own view? Why?
  3. What do you think could be some of the most difficult obstacles in the way of implementing developmentally appropriate practices? Why?
Key Terms

Click on each key term to see the definition.

Comprehensive curriculum

A curriculum that addresses all areas of learning

Constructivist

A person whose approach to teaching is based on Jean Piaget’s theory of cognitive development

Content area

A specific subject area of curriculum, such as literacy, math, or science

Curriculum

A structured framework for teaching

Curriculum approach

A broad, flexible conceptual framework for teaching based on a particular theoretical perspective

Curriculum model

A conceptual framework for teaching that describes everything about what and how a teacher will teach

Developmental domain

A specific aspect of overall child development, such as cognitive, social/emotional, physical growth, or creativity

Developmentally appropriate practice

Teaching based on developmental and cultural knowledge of both individuals and groups of children and their families

Early intervention

Providing instructional and family support to identify and address special needs at the earliest possible time in order to give at-risk children the best possible transition to elementary school

Environment

The physical space within which early childhood curriculum is implemented

Executive functioning

Higher-order thinking, characterized in young children by the ability to plan activity and control impulses

Head Start

Federally funded preschool programs established in 1964 to provide early childhood education for children considered at risk for school failure

Hidden curriculum

Things children and teachers are expected to know that may not be intentionally taught

Infants

Children from birth to 18 months of age

Kindergarten

The transitional year between preschool and first grade

Limited-scope curriculum

A curriculum that addresses a single or limited number of learning areas (like math or literacy)

Metacognition

Intentional thinking about one’s ideas and thinking process

Preschoolers

Children from ages 3 to 5

Scaffolding

A teaching strategy that focuses on providing help and support to enable children to advance from tasks or activities they can do independently to a higher level

Self-regulation

The ability to exercise impulse control

Standards

Statements about what children should know and be able to do, developed by states, programs, or organizations that represent different dimensions of curriculum

Teacher-child ratio

The number of children an individual teacher is responsible for, such as 1:4 for infants

Toddlers

Children from 18 to 36 months of age

World view

Internalized values that affect how people perceive and interpret the ideas and actions of others

Zone of proximal development (ZPD)

Described by Vygotsky as a time window between what a child can do independently to what he or she can do with teacher assistance

Recommended Reading

Educating Esm: Diary of a Teacher’s First Year, by Esm Raji Codel (first published in 1999, updated in 2009 by Algonquin Books (Chapel Hill, NC). This is a lively and insightful account of a young teacher who describes the challenges she faced as a first year teacher and how she navigated her way through them.

References

Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2007). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Branscombe, N. A., Castle, K., Dorsey, A. G., Surbeck, E., & Taylor, J. B. (2003). Early childhood curriculum: A constructivist perspective. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C. (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

Bredekamp, S., & Rozengrant, T. J. (1992). Reaching potentials: appropriate curriculum and assessment for young children. Washington, DC: NAEYC.

Bronson, P., & Merryman, A. (2009). Nurture shock: New thinking about children. New York: Twelve.

Cannela, G., Swadener, B., & Che, Y. (2008). Reconceptualists. R. S. New & M. Cochran (Eds.), Early childhood education: An international encyclopedia. pp. 693696. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

Chaille, C. (2008). Constructivism across the curriculum in early childhood classrooms: Big ideas as inspiration. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Charlesworth, R. (2004). Understanding child development (7th ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.

Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Initiative. (2010). Common Core State Standards for mathematics [PDF file]. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Math_Standards1.pdf

Cooper, P. M. (2009). The classroom all young children need: Lessons in teaching by Vivian Paley. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (Eds.). (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in programs serving children birth to eight. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

Dewey, J. (January, 1897). My pedagogic creed. School Journal, 54, 7780.

Dewey, J. (1904). The relation of theory to practice in education. Third Yearbook of the National Society for the Scientific Study of Education (pp. 930). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan.

Epstein, A. (2009). Growing readers early literacy preschool curriculum (2nd ed.) Ypsilanti, MI: High Scope Educational Research Foundation.

Epstein, A. (2010). Numbers plus mathematics curriculum for preschool. Ypsilanti, MI: High Scope Educational Research Foundation.

Epstein, A. S., & Hohmann, M. (2012). The high scope preschool curriculum. Ypsilanti, MI: High Scope Educational Research Foundation.

Erdman, S., & Downing, M. (2015, February/March). The science of superheroes. Teaching Young Children, 8(3). Retrieved from https://www.naeyc.org/resources/pubs/tyc/feb2015/science-superheroes

Fenwick, W. E., & Anderson, G. L. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage handbook of educational leadership: Advances in theory, research, and practice (p. 499). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Frede, E., & Ackerman, D. J. (March, 2007). Preschool curriculum decision-making: Dimensions to consider. Preschool Policy Brief, Issue 12. New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research, Rutgers University.

Gandini, L. (1993). Fundamentals of the Reggio Emilia approach to early childhood education. Young Children, 49(1), 48.

Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.

Giroux, H., & Purpel, D. (1983). The hidden curriculum and moral education: Deception or discovery? Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

Goffin, S., & Wilson, C. (2001). Curriculum models and early childhood education: Appraising the relationship (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

Henderson, J., & Kesson, K. R. (2004). Curriculum wisdom: Educational decisions in democratic societies. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Heroman, C., et al. (2010). The creative curriculum for preschool (5th ed.). Bethesda, MD: Teaching Strategies.

Hill, L. T., Stremmel, A. J., & Fu, V. R. (2005). Teaching as inquiry: Rethinking curriculum in early childhood education. Boston: Pearson.

Hyun, E. (2002). No Child Left Behind Act. R. S. New & M. Cochran (Eds.) Early childhood education: An international encyclopedia. New York: Greenwood.

Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.

Katz, L. (1999). Curriculum disputes in early childhood education. ERIC Digest Document Number #ED436298.

Kilpatrick, T. H. (September 1918). The project method. Teachers College Record, 19, 319334.

Malaguzzi, L. (1993). For an education based on relationships. (Lella Gandini, Trans.). Young Children, 49(1), 912.

McAlpine, L., Frew, E., & Lucas, M. (1991). Mechanisms for helping becoming practitioners develop professional ways of knowing. M. Baskett, V. J. Marsick, T. G. Pearson, D. R. Klevans, & J. Delehanty (Eds.), Proceedings of the continuing education preconference of the American Association of Adult and Continuing Education (pp. 6773). University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.

Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, 512.

Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Miller, J. P. (2007). The holistic curriculum (2nd ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Miller, J. P., & Seller, W. (1990). Curriculum: Perspectives and practice. Toronto: Copp, Clark, Pittman Longman Division.

Montessori, M. (2008). The Montessori method. Lexington, KY: BN Publishing. (Original work published in 1909.)

Montessori, M. (2007). The absorbent mind. Radford, VA: Wilder Publications, Inc. (Original work published in 1949.)

Morrison, G. (2011). Early childhood education today (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merril Prentice Hall.

Myles, B. S., Trautman, M. L., & Schelvan, R. (2004). The hidden curriculum: Practical solutions for understanding unstated rules in social situations. Shawnee Mission, KS: Autism Asperger Publishing.

National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). (2003). Early childhood curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation: Building an effective, accountable system in programs for children birth through age 8 (position statement with expanded resources). Washington, DC: NAEYC.

National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). (n.d.). More about us. Retrieved from https://www.naeyc.org/about-us/people/more-about-us

National Association for the Education of Young Children, National Association of Early Childhood Specialists in State Departments of Education. (2003). Early childhood curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation (a joint position statement). Washington, DC: NAEYC.

National Child Care Information and Technical Assistance Center (NCCIC) Curricula/Teaching approaches for preschool education. Retrieved from: http://occ-archive.org/poptopics/curricula-ece.html.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Number and operations standard for grades PreK2. Retrieved from: http://www.nctm.org/standards/content.aspx?id=7564.

Newkirk, T. (2002) Misreading masculinity. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2008) Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (5th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Paley, V. G. (1992). You can’t say you can’t play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought. New York: Viking Press. (Original work published in 1975.)

Pinar, W., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (2008). Understanding curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.

Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

Scott-Little, C., Lesko, J., Martella, J., & Milburn, P. (2007). Early learning standards: Results from a National Survey to Document Trends in State-Level Policies and Practices. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 9(1). Retrieved from: http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v9n1/little.html.

Sears, A. (2003). Retooling the mind factory: Education in a lean state. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Smith, M. K. (1996, 2000). Curriculum theory and practice. The encyclopaedia of informal education. Retrieved from: www.infed.org/biblio/b-curric.htm.

Spodek, B., & Brown, P. C. (1993). Curriculum alternatives in early childhood education: A historical perspective. B. Spodek (Ed.), Handbook of research on the education of young children (pp. 91104). New York: Macmillan.

Toffler, A. (1990). Future shock. New York: Random House. (Original work published in 1970.)

Toppo, G. (2008). Nation at risk: The best thing or the worst thing for education? USA Today. Retrieved from: http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2008-04-22-nation-at-risk_N.htm.

Tyler, R. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). Administration for Children and Families. A guide to good start, grow smart in child care. Retrieved from: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ccb/initiatives/gsgs/gsgs_guide/guide.htm.

Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language (E. Hanfmann & G. Vokar, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (Original work published in 1934).

Willis, S. (November 1993). Teaching young children: Educators seek “developmental appropriateness.” Curriculum Update. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved from: http://www.ascd.org/publications/curriculum-update/nov1993/Teaching-Young-Children.aspx.

Place Your Order Here!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *