Assignment: Group ASE-C-POP chart
Assignment: Group ASE-C-POP chart
Weight: 30%
PATIENT CASE STUDY:
You will research and identify any actual/potential medication issues and create a plan to solve these issues using the ASE-C-POP framework Assignment: Group ASE-C-POP chart. It is suggested you read the following article, as it will assist you in understanding the aspects of this framework:
Also, see next page for further guideline on what ASE-C-POP headings refer to:
ASE-C-POP FRAMEWORK CHART:
Your submission MUST use the ASE-C-POP chart template provided to you in the group assignment folder blackboard:
Chart Specifications:
· Your submission must fit into the two-page framework using the following specifications:
· Margins must be kept at the set size within template provided
· Times New Roman Font
· No smaller than 11-point font size
· You MAY resize the individual sections, e.g. if you require more space for your therapeutic plan, that cell can be made larger – as long as the ENTIRE chart fits on two A4 pages (this does NOT include your references)
Assignment: Group ASE-C-POP chart
· QUT NUMBERED REFERENCING MUST BE USED – please access instructions of how to use this referencing style via the library.
LINK: http://www.citewrite.qut.edu.au/cite/qutcite.jsp#numbered
PLEASE NOTE: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ANY OF THESE GUIDELINES WILL RESULT IN ZERO MARKS FOR THIS ASSESSMENT
ASSIGNMENT RUBRIC
Please refer to the assignment rubric on the following page for a more detailed breakdown of how marks will be awarded for this assignment.
It is important for you to note that you do not start with 100% and lose marks; you start with zero and EARN marks based on your submission Assignment: Group ASE-C-POP chart.
Marking Rubric – Assessment 2 –ASE-C-POP Chart (25% weight) – Semester 2, 2017 Patient Case chosen by the Student Team: Mary or Dennis (circle)
0 % | 25% Requires Improvement | 50% Benchmark | 75% Proficient | 100% Accomplished | |
Overall submission presentation/language
[10%] |
Did not follow assignment instructions, chart did not fit onto two A4 pages, margins changed, smaller than size 11 Times New Roman font used | Template used correctly. Little/no use of professional language, many spelling or grammatical errors. | Template used correctly. Some use of professional language, some spelling or grammatical errors. | Template used correctly. Good use of professional language, very few spelling or grammatical errors. | Template used correctly. Excellent use of professional language, no spelling or grammatical errors. |
Identified therapeutic issues (actual & potential problems) of the case scenario, by sourcing & applying up-to-date pharmacotherapeutic & clinical knowledge.
[30%] |
Did not follow assignment instructions or no problems discussed. | Poor understanding & description of the actual & potential problems. No distinction between actual & potential problems. | Some understanding & description of actual & potential problems. Some distinction between actual & potential problems. | Good understanding & description of actual & potential problems. Good distinction between actual & potential problems. | Excellent understanding & description of actual & potential problems. Excellent distinction between actual & potential therapeutic problems. |
Demonstrated therapeutic decision-making and a therapeutic plan using Quality Use of Medicines (QUM) principles [30%] | Did not follow assignment instructions or no management plan devised that addressed QUM issues in this patient. Information factually incorrect or confusing & inadequate & results in significant and/or immediate patient harm. | Poorly devised management plan that does not address QUM issues for this patient. Information is factually incorrect or confusing or inadequate & results in patient harm. | Management plan devised that adequately addresses most QUM issues in this patient. Information is rarely factually incorrect or inadequate but should not result in patient harm. | Management plan devised that addresses all QUM issues in this patient, with some justification of prioritisation. Information is factually correct & accurate. Articulated various options prior to presentation of chosen therapeutic plan. | Management plan devised that addresses all QUM issues for this patient with excellent justification of problem/s, Information is factually correct & accurate. Concise & direct & convincing. Articulated various options prior to presentation of chosen therapeutic plan. |
Therapeutic Plan Identifies opportunities for collaboration to improve patient care with a multi-professional context [10%] | Did not follow assignment instructions or demonstrated no opportunities for collaboration between other health disciplines. | Demonstrated some opportunities for collaboration between other health disciplines in an attempt to improve patient care. | Demonstrated good opportunities for collaboration between other health disciplines to improve patient care. | Demonstrated a very good description of opportunities for collaboration between other health disciplines to improve patient care. | Demonstrated an excellent description of opportunities for collaboration between other health disciplines to improve patient care. |
Appropriate and up-to-date In-text Referencing and Reference list in QUT Numbered Referencing Style
[20%] Assignment: Group ASE-C-POP chart |
Did not follow assignment instructions, or Failure to use QUT numbered referencing & Reference List and/or irrelevant, imprecise or inaccurate referencing. | Some evidence of a QUT numbered reference List, with mostly limited references and mostly inaccurate referencing. | Good evidence of an overall comprehensive QUT numbered Reference List with up-to-date references, relevant, appropriate, with mostly precise and accurate referencing with some errors. | Strong evidence of an overall comprehensive QUT numbered Reference List that is up-to-date, relevant, appropriate; and precise and accurate referencing with few errors. | Strong evidence of a comprehensive QUT numbered Reference List that is up-to-date, relevant, appropriate; and precise and accurate referencing with no errors. |
Assessors’ Notes: Did the team submit their framework within the TWO PAGE TEMPLATE PROVIDED? Y/N – if NO: zero marks
Hard copy of team contract submitted? Y/N; Which Student submitted? …………………. WORKSHOP DAY & TIME: Room Location: TEAM NUMBER:
Assessor 1 initials: ……. Grade Awarded: Assessor 2 Initials: …… Grade Awarded: FINAL GRADE:
Assignment: Group ASE-C-POP chart