assessment
To Prepare
· Review the resources and clinical skills in the PMHNP Clinical Skills List document. It is recommended that you print out this document to serve as a guide throughout your practicum.
· Review the “Developing SMART Goals” resource on how to develop goals and objectives that follow the SMART framework.
· Review the resources on nursing competencies and nursing theory and consider how these inform your practice.
· Download the Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form to complete this Assignment.
Assignment
Use the PMHNP Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form to complete the following:
· Rate yourself according to your confidence level performing the procedures identified on the Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form.
· Based on your ratings, summarize your strengths and opportunities for improvement.
· Based on your self-assessment and theory of nursing practice, develop 3–4 measurable goals and objectives for this practicum experience. Include them on the designated area of the form.
Rubric
PRAC_6645_Week1_Assignment2_Rubric
| PRAC_6645_Week1_Assignment2_Rubric |
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRate yourself according to your confidence level performing the skills identified on the Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form. |
| 25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
The response provides ratings for all skills on the form. |
22 to >19.0 pts
Good
The response provides ratings for most of the skills on the form. |
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response provides ratings for some of the skills on the form. |
17 to >0 pts
Poor
The response provides ratings for only a few skills on the form, or ratings are missing. |
|
25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBased on your ratings, summarize your strengths and opportunities for improvement. |
| 30 to >26.0 pts
Excellent
The response provides an accurate, clear, and complete summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. |
26 to >23.0 pts
Good
The response provides an accurate summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. |
23 to >20.0 pts
Fair
The response provides a somewhat vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. |
20 to >0 pts
Poor
The response provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary of the strengths and/or opportunities for improvement, or the summaries are missing. |
|
30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBased on your self-assessment and theory of nursing practice, develop three to four (3–4) measurable goals and objectives for this Practicum experience. Include them on the designated area of the form. |
| 30 to >26.0 pts
Excellent
The response provides three to four (3–4) clear, appropriate, and measurable goals and objectives for the practicum experience. |
26 to >23.0 pts
Good
The response provides three to four (3–4) appropriate, measurable goals and objectives for the practicum experience. |
23 to >20.0 pts
Fair
The response provides three to four (3–4) unclear or inappropriate goals and objectives for the practicum experience. |
20 to >0 pts
Poor
The response provides three to four (3–4) unclear or inappropriate goals and objectives for the practicum experience, or goals and objectives are missing. |
|
30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling, nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria. |
| 5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided, which delineates all required criteria. |
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. |
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. |
3 to >0 pts
Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time…. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. |
|
5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
| 5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. |
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
3 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
|
5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—APA Format: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and Reference List. |
| 5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors. |
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. |
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. |
3 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥5) APA format errors. |
|
5 pts |
| Total Points: 100 |
Related