LITERATURE REVIEW
Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer- reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:· Properly identify 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed.
/ 20 pts
· Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.
/ 40 pts
· Synthesize the findings from the 4
/ 25 pts
20 to >17 pts Excellent
The response identifies 4 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment.
17 to >15 pts Good
The response identifies 3 peer-reviewed research articles and one peer-reviewed article for the Assignment.
15 to >13 pts Fair
The response identifies 4 or less peer- reviewed articles
13 to >0 pts Poor
The response identifies less than 4 peer- reviewed articles or peer- reviewed articles are missing
40 to >35 pts Excellent The response accurately and thoroughly summarizes in detail each study reviewed, explaining in detail the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described….Sp ecific, accurate, and detailed examples are provided which fully support the response.
35 to >31 pts Good The response summarizes each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described….Ac curate examples are provided which support the response provided.
31 to >27 pts Fair The response is missing one or two of the required elements or summaries are superficially addressed.
27 to >0 pts Poor The response is missing three or more required elements or the summaries are superficially addressed.
25 to >22 pts 22 to >19 pts 19 to >17 pts 17 to >0 pts
7/16/24, 4:42 PM Module 4: Week 8: Assignment: Anastacia Okoye
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/118716/assignments/1403538/submissions/127525 1/3
NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
peer-reviewed research articles in a cohesive conclusion.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraph s make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused– neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
/ 5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
/ 5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers,
/ 5 pts
Excellent
Response includes a synthesis of the findings in an exceptionally well-written conclusion.
Good
Response includes a synthesis of the findings in a well-written conclusion.
Fair
The response is missing a synthesis of the findings or the conclusion is superficial.
Poor
The response is missing a synthesis of the findings and the conclusion is not accurate or is missing.
5 to >4 pts Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
4 to >3 pts Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
3 to >2 pts Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
2 to >0 pts Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
5 to >4 pts Excellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to >3 pts Good Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to >2 pts Fair Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
2 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 to >4 pts Excellent Uses correct APA format with no errors.
4 to >3 pts Good Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
3 to >2 pts Fair Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
2 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
7/16/24, 4:42 PM Module 4: Week 8: Assignment: Anastacia Okoye
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/118716/assignments/1403538/submissions/127525 2/3
NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
Total Points: 0
7/16/24, 4:42 PM Module 4: Week 8: Assignment: Anastacia Okoye
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/118716/assignments/1403538/submissions/127525 3/3