Ethical Dilemma $10 discussion
While theorizing can be a good opportunity to conjecture about ideas, including possible real-life implementations of policy, doctrine, or hypotheses, when theory is used to inform action, there exists the possibility of transgressing ethical boundaries. Often, a good idea in theory can result in negative effects that are unforeseen in theoretical models. Nevertheless, there are scholars and practitioners alike who would brave questionable ethical grounds in order to further the discipline and possibly increase their ability to help people in the long run.
In your initial post, explain the ethical dilemma you chose. Then select an ethical theory from your reading. Answer the following questions:
· How could theory have been applied in your ethical dilemma?
· Would the outcome have been different if you did apply the theory? Explain your answer.
· How will you use this theory in your future APRN Practice?
One of the ethical dilemma I face as an ICU nurse/ witness are family members going against patients wishes. Family members want to continue treatment even when its not in the patients best interest/ prognosis of patient isa poor, based on the healthcare team.
Please apply Freire’s theory of human liberation and a minimum of 2 references, the book can be one if you use the readings attached below.
If you have any questions please reach out to me!! I have attached a picture of the book and Freirs theory. Thank you!
| NUR 5209 Discussion Rubric | ||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| Topical Focus
view longer description |
40 pts
Full Credit Posts remain on the topic indicated in the instructions and apply the topic to the APRN role or practice. 20 pts Partial Credit Posts align with the topic but do not follow instructions or do not apply topical knowledge to the APRN role or practice. 10 pts Minimum Credit Posts are off-topic and do not address the APRN role or practice. 0 pts No Credit Criterion not met or post not submitted. |
/ 40 pts |
| Participation/Timing
view longer description |
30 pts
Full Credit One (1) initial discussion post is posted no later than Day 4, and at least two (2) response posts are posted no later than Day 1. 15 pts Partial Credit One (1) initial discussion post is posted no later than Day 4 and one (1) peer response by Day 1. 0 pts No Credit One (1) initial discussion post is posted no later than Day 4, but no peer responses completed. |
/ 30 pts |
| Content Quality / References
view longer description |
20 pts
Full Credit Initial post contains 3-5 scholarly/peer-reviewed references that are less than 5 years old; response posts each contain at least 1 scholarly/peer-reviewed reference that is less than 5 years old. 10 pts Partial Credit Initial post may contain less than 3-5 scholarly/peer-reviewed references or contain references that are more than 5 years old (without reason given); response posts may not contain at least 1 scholarly/peer-reviewed reference. 5 pts Minimum Credit Initial posts contain 1 or no scholarly/peer-reviewed references or contain references that are more than 5 years old; response posts do not contain at least 1 scholarly/peer-reviewed reference. 0 pts No Credit Criterion not met or post not submitted. |
/ 20 pts |
| APA and Grammar
view longer description |
10 pts
Full Credit Post follows general journal article formatting as outlined by the APA. 6 pts Partial Credit Post follows some aspects of general journal article formatting as outlined by the APA but does not follow all the ways possible. 3 pts Minimum Credit Post does not follow any aspect of general journal article formatting as outlined by the APA. 0 pts No Credit Criterion not met or post not submitted. |
/ 10 pts |
| Total Points: 0 |