Lesson 2 Discussion
A woman has just been diagnosed with breast cancer. Her doctor tells her that while cancer is a multifactorial disease, she carries the breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA1. One of her two identical twin 19-year-old daughters is afraid that she also may have inherited the gene (Chapter 4, Learning Objective 2, 3, 8).
- What considerations would you give her daughter who is worried about inheriting the cancer gene?
- What ethical issues are raised when one identical twin wants to know her genetic susceptibility to a disease and other does not?
Case Study Discussion Rubric
Case Study Discussion Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Main Issues / Problems
20 ptsProficient
Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the main issues/problems in the case study.
15 ptsDeveloping Proficiency
Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of most of the issues/problems.
10 ptsInadequate
Identifies and demonstrates acceptable understanding of some of the issues/problems in the case study
0 ptsNo Marks
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis and Evaluation of Issues / Problems
20 ptsProficient
Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of all identified issues/problems. Rationales are supported by strong evidence.
15 ptsDeveloping Proficiency
Presents a thorough analysis of most of the issues identified. Uses weak evidence to support rationale.
10 ptsInadequate
Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis of some of the identified issues. Rationales are not supported by evidence.
0 ptsNo Marks
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendations on Effective Solutions / Strategies
20 ptsProficient
Supports diagnosis and opinions with strong arguments and well documented evidence; presents a balanced and critical view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective.
15 ptsDeveloping Proficiency
Supports diagnosis and opinions with limited reasoning and evidence; presents a somewhat one-sided argument; demonstrates little engagement with ideas presented.
10 ptsInadequate
Little or no action suggested and/or inappropriate solutions proposed to the issues in the case study.
0 ptsNo Marks
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLinks to Course Readings and Additional Research Makes appropriate and powerful connections
20 ptsProficient
Makes appropriate and powerful connections between identified issues/ problems and the strategic concepts studied; supplements case study with relevant and thoughtful research and documents all sources of information.
15 ptsDeveloping Proficiency
Makes appropriate but somewhat vague connections between identified issues/problems and concepts studied; demonstrates limited command of the analytical tools studied; supplements case study with limited research.
10 ptsInadequate
Identified issues/problems and concepts studied; demonstrates limited command of the analytical tools studied; supplements case study with limited research.
0 ptsNo Marks
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePeer Response
10 ptsProficient
Discussion response is comprehensive, accurate, and complete. Key points are clearly stated, explained, and supported. No grammar or spelling issues.
8 ptsDeveloping Proficiency
Answer is accurate and complete. Key points are stated and supported. Minor grammar or spelling issues.
5 ptsInadequate
Answer is partial or incomplete. Key points are unclear. Significant grammar or spelling issues.
0 ptsNo Marks
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics and Formatting Guidelines
10 ptsProficient
Demonstrates clarity, conciseness and correctness; formatting is appropriate and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors. Uses APA 7th ed. Correctly for citations and references.
8 ptsDeveloping Proficiency
Occasional grammar or spelling errors, but still a clear presentation of ideas; lacks organization. Uses APA 7th ed. Correctly for citations and references with minor issues.
5 ptsInadequate
Writing is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors; poorly organized and does not follow specified guidelines. Does no adhere to APA 7th ed. Guidelines.
0 ptsNo Marks
10 pts
Total Points: 100