COMMON SENSE AND INDEPENDENCE

COMMON SENSE AND INDEPENDENCE

In January 1776, Thomas Paine, a radical political theorist and writer who had come to America from England in 1774, published a 50-page pamphlet, Common Sense . Within three months, it sold 100,000 copies . Paine attacked the idea of a hereditary monarchy, declaring that one honest man was worth more to society than “all the crowned ruf- fians that ever lived .” He presented the alternatives — continued sub- mission to a tyrannical king and an outworn government, or liberty and happiness as a self-sufficient, independent republic . Circulated throughout the colonies, Common Sense helped to crystallize a decision for separation .

CHAPTER 3: THE ROAD TO INDEPENDENCE

OUTLINE OF U.S. HISTORY

61

There still remained the task, however, of gaining each colony’s approval of a formal declaration . On June 7, Richard Henry Lee of Vir- ginia introduced a resolution in the Second Continental Congress, de- claring, “That these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent states . . . .” Immedi- ately, a committee of five, headed by Thomas Jefferson of Virginia, was appointed to draft a document for a vote .

Largely Jefferson’s work, the Dec- laration of Independence, adopted July 4, 1776, not only announced the birth of a new nation, but also set forth a philosophy of human free- dom that would become a dynamic force throughout the entire world . The Declaration drew upon French and English Enlightenment political philosophy, but one influence in par- ticular stands out: John Locke’s Sec- ond Treatise on Government . Locke took conceptions of the traditional rights of Englishmen and universal- ized them into the natural rights of all humankind . The Declaration’s familiar opening passage echoes Locke’s social-contract theory of government:

We hold these truths to be self- evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from

the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Jefferson linked Locke’s princi-

ples directly to the situation in the colonies . To fight for American in- dependence was to fight for a gov- ernment based on popular consent in place of a government by a king who had “combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowl- edged by our laws . . . .” Only a gov- ernment based on popular consent could secure natural rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness . Thus, to fight for American inde- pendence was to fight on behalf of one’s own natural rights .

Place Your Order Here!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *