Explains how issue impacts audience but with gaps in clarity, detail, or support
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation demonstrates sophisticated understanding of relationship between issue and audience
Explains how issue impacts audience, supporting response with examples from research investigation
Explains how issue impacts audience but with gaps in clarity, detail, or support
Does not explain how issue impacts audience
15.8
Empirical Evidence [SCI-200-04]
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and response demonstrates strong understanding of how to use empirical evidence in drawing conclusions about the impact of contemporary scientific issues
Describes empirical evidence that supports conclusions about impact of issues on self and audience, supporting response with examples from research investigation
Describes empirical evidence that supports conclusions about impact of issues on self and audience, but with gaps in clarity, detail, or support
Does not describe empirical evidence that supports conclusions about impact of issues on self and audience
15.8
2
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Personally [SCI-200-01]
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation demonstrates keen insight into impact of natural sciences on personal experiences
Explains why issue is important personally
Explains why issue is important personally but with gaps in clarity or detail
Does not explain why issue is important personally
15.8
Investigation [SCI-200-01]
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and response demonstrates insight into relationship between issue and scientific thinking
Illustrates how investigation of issue impacted thinking on the issue, supporting response with examples from research investigation
Illustrates how investigation of issue impacted thinking on the issue but with gaps in clarity, detail, or support
Does not illustrate how investigation of issue impacted thinking on the issue
15.8
Message [SCI-200-03]
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and presentation demonstrates understanding of effectively communicating with specific audiences by tailoring message
Communicates message effectively in a way that is tailored to specific audience
Communicates message to audience, but communication is not effective or is not tailored to specific audience
Does not communicate message to audience
15.8
Articulation of Response
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
5.2
Total 100%
3
- SCI 200 Project Part Two Guidelines and Rubric
- Overview
- Prompt
- Project Part Two Rubric
Place Your Order Here!