Rationale:Support the case analysis with a 750-word rationale explaining the solution you chose and why.
Support the case analysis with a 750-word rationale explaining the solution you chose and why.
Include how that solution:
· Supports the school’s vision and mission and safeguards the values of democracy, equity, and diversity.
· Promotes social justice and ensures that individual student needs inform all aspects of schooling.
· Promotes collaboration, trust, learning, and high expectations.
Cite the case and any other source documents as appropriate.
APA style format is required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and PSEL (Professional Standards for Educational Leaders) should be referenced using APA documentation guidelines
npbea.org › wp-content › uploads › 2017/06 › Professional-Standards-for-Educational-Leaders
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
1. Case analysis template questions 1-3 (10): Analysis skillfully and convincingly summarizes the case, identifies the issues to be resolved, and identifies the stakeholders involved in the issues.
2. Case analysis questions 4-5(10): Identifies compelling existing laws or court rulings and district policies related to the issues.
3. Case analysis questions 6-8(20): Identifies exceptional possible solutions to the issues and insightfully selects the ideal solutions. Action steps and timeline are thoughtful and realistic.
4. Case analysis question 9(10): Moral and legal consequences of proposed solutions are thorough and proficiently explained.
5. Rationale (30): compellingly explains how the proposed solutions support the school’s vision and mission while safeguarding the values of democracy, equity, and diversity within the school; skillfully promote social justice and ensure that individual student needs inform all aspects of schooling; and promote collaboration, trust, learning, and high expectations.
6. Organization (5): The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
7. Document Sources (5): are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
8. Mechanics (10): Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
=100%